Legal Opinion · Dissent

Henry Clay Burks v. Charles Egeler, Warden, People of the State of Michigan

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1975No. 73-2003Published

1DissentMcCREE, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent, and I would reverse the judgment of the district court and remand the case for an evidentiary hearing on the question whether the defense witnesses were so terrorized in the courthouse that they perjured themselves or refused to testify because of fear for their safety. The affidavit of trial defense counsel states that he was made aware of the threats made by a prosecution witness and that he communicated this fact to the trial judge. The affidavits of several intended defense witnesses that their lives were threatened if they dared to testify and that they did not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Moore v. DempseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Mosby v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. People v. BurksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API