Legal Opinion
State, Dept. of Human Resources v. Shinall
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 25, 1997No. F-626 & F-1006; CA A92497PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Appellant Ball appeals the judgment in this paternity proceeding. The judgment set aside a 1989 judgment that declared that respondent Shinall was the father of the child of respondent mother, Shires. The judgment also declared that Ball is the father. We reverse.
The child was born October 22,1988. On October 23, Shires, who was receiving public assistance, filled out and signed a paternity affidavit in which she named Shinall as the child’s father. Shinall was served with a copy of the state’s Notice and Finding of Financial Responsibility, ORS 416.415, which stated, inter alia, that he had…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Far West Landscaping, Inc. v. Pacific Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Matter of Marriage of VinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Farmers' Loan Co. v. Oregon Pacific RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Stevenson v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Patrick v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- City of Canby v. RinkesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- In the Matter of Marriage of Pierce and PierceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006