Legal Opinion

Winn-Dixie Atlanta, Inc. v. Couch

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 17, 1989No. A89A1478PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Cecil Wayne Couch, an employee of Automatic Icemaker Company, suffered an on-the-job injury while on the premises of WinnDixie Atlanta, Inc. (“Winn-Dixie”). Couch received workers’ compensation benefits through his employer and filed a tort action against Winn-Dixie. Winn-Dixie denied the material allegations of the complaint and subsequently filed a motion for summary judgment. A major argument asserted by Winn-Dixie was that it was Couch’s statutory employer under OCGA § 34-9-11.

The undisputed evidence showed that on May 28, 1985, Winn Dixie was in the final stages…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Modlin v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  2. Wright v. M. D. Hodges Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Whitehead v. CHP, LTD.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Dross v. Southern Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Yoho v. Ringier of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  2. Falagan v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Fennell v. Max Rittenbaum, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Fowler-Flemister Concrete, Inc. v. SumnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Yoho v. Ringier of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API