Legal Opinion

City of Tucson, Corp. v. Cheryl A. Tanno & the Estate

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 10, 2018No. 2 CA-CV 2017-0143Published

1Opinion of the Court

EPPICH, Judge:

¶1 In this eminent domain case, Cheryl Tanno and the estate of Pasquale Tanno appeal from a final judgment awarding them $365,910 in compensation for real property condemned by the City of Tucson. They argue the trial court committed error in making evidentiary determinations, refusing to tender certain jury instructions, and declining to award sanctions for a purported discovery violation. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

¶2 In 2015, the City of Tucson filed an eminent domain complaint in superior court seeking to condemn a parcel of real…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Hawkins v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Dombey v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Ritchie v. KrasnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. Meyer Intellectual Properties Ltd. v. Bodum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API