Legal Opinion

Clarke v. Duffield

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1930No. Docket No. 6644PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

By the second paragraph of the will of the testator eleven different legacies were bequeathed to as many different persons “to be distributed in the due course of the settlement” of his estate. The ninth paragraph of the will provided as follows:

“Should I pay the amount, or any part thereof, of any of above specified legacies to any of said named legatees, or establish trusts for said amounts, or any part thereof, for the benefit of any of said respective legatees, before my decease, the same shall be taken as satisfaction of said legacies for the amount so paid, to, or established, in favor…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Estate of BournCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Kasper v. KellarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  3. Duerden v. CooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Estate of TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Kellar v. KasperDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API