Legal Opinion

Duerden v. Cooney

California Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1967No. L. A. No. 29051PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, C. J.

Eva Barclay Taylor died testate September 14, 1963. Her will provided that one-third of the residue of her estate should go to Ellen Catherine Glasky if she survived distribution of the estate. If she predeceased distribution, her one-third share was to go in equal shares to *857Harold James Duerden and William Henry Duerden, Jr.1 The will was admitted to probate on November 26, 1963, and letters testamentary were issued to Harold, the executor of the estate, on December 2,1963. The petition for final distribution was filed March 4, 1965, requesting that one-third of the residue of the estate be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stiebel v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Estate of JamesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Partridge v. Von AhndenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Estate of TolerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Clarke v. DuffieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Estate of BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Estate of TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Matter of Estate of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. Allen v. SheaIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Estate of Harmon v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API