Holland v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment of conviction as for a violation of Section 3985 of the Code 1923.
Upon consideration of the record on this appeal we find that the conviction of this appellant, defendant in the court below, was unjustified and unwarranted either in law, or in fact.
The offense charged was that he did entice, decoy, or persuade M. C. Terry, a servant, to leave the service or employment of Grady Knight, his master.
The evidence disclosed that said M. C. Terry was working for Knight as a farm laborer. Knight, among other .things, testified : “He worked for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Howard v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Clark v. RyanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Peacock v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- National Life Insurance Co. of U. S. v. FergusonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. SummersAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bailey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942