Legal Opinion

Bailey v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 1942No. 5 Div. 145PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The indictment against the appellant and upon which he was tried in the court below charged that Joe Huguley, Otis Reed and Leo Bailey (appellant) feloniously took cer^ tain described money of the United States of America, the property of Bob Adams, from his person, and against his will, by-violence to his person, etc. That is to say said indictment charged the offense of robbery*.

It is shown by this record that when the above named Joe Huguley and Otis Reed were arraigned upon the above indictment, they, each respectively, pleaded guilty and upon their pleas of guilt…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Doss v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Doss v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Slayton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Read v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. McDaniels v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. King v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. Calloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  5. Coats v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API