Wisconsin Judicial Commission v. Gableman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION OF
JUSTICE DAVID T. PROSSER, JUSTICE PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK AND JUSTICE ANNETTE KINGSLAND ZIEGLER
¶ 1. Justice David T. Prosser, Justice Patience Drake Roggensack and Justice Annette Kingsland Ziegler: *632The court is at an impasse. Three members of the court, Justice Prosser, Justice Roggensack and Justice Ziegler, agree with the recommendation of the three-judge Judicial Conduct Panel (Panel) that the Wisconsin Judicial Commission's (Commission) complaint against Justice Michael J. Gableman must be dismissed. We agree with the Panel's recommendation because after…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wisconsin Judicial Commission v. GablemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Lawyer Regulation System v. KesslerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. KesslerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010