Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kessler

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 2010No. 2008AP834-DPublished

1ConcurrenceAnnette Kingsland Ziegler, J.

¶ 35. (concurring). I concur and agree that in this case, we are bound by the referee's findings of fact because they have not been shown to be clearly erroneous. Per *575curiam, ¶ 26. As Justice Prosser, Justice Roggensack, and Justice Ziegler noted in the Gobiernan decision, see In re Judicial Disciplinary Proceedings Against Gableman, 2010 WI 62, ¶ 52, 325 Wis. 2d 631, 784 N.W.2d 631, this court is to observe the findings of facts or stipulation of facts as they exist in the record. As Justice Prosser, Justice Roggensack, and Justice Ziegler further observed in the Gobiernan decision, it is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Judicial Commission v. GablemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Wisconsin Judicial Commission v. GablemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API