Legal Opinion
Loft Corp. v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 19, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In six related actions, inter alia, to recover damages for an unconsti*550tutional taking of real property and under Public Health Law § 1105, the defendant in each action, the City of New York, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), entered July 3, 1997, which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint in each action.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs payable by the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, the motion is granted, and the complaints are dismissed.
The plaintiffs in these six actions seek,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Parkview Associates v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Church of St. Paul & St. Andrew v. BarwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Rockland Light and Power Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kittay v. GiulianiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Neale v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001