Legal Opinion
United States v. Arreola
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 7, 2006No. 04-10504PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The panel has decided to amend the opinion filed April 26, 2006. A substituted amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order.
With the filing of the amended opinion, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Thomas has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Wallace and Judge Hawkins so recommend.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no active judge has requested a vote whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing is DENIED, and the petition for rehearing en banc is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James E. KESSI, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. GillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Edison Misla-AldarondoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. NobariCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.