Orest Baidan v. Thomas Kuhnle, et al.

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 OREST BAIDAN, Case No. 24-cv-06178-NW 7 Plaintiff, 8 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION 9 THOMAS KUHNLE, et al., Re: ECF No. 11 10 Defendants. 11 12 13 The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge DeMarchi’s Report and Recommendation 14 (“R&R”) to dismiss Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”) in part pursuant to the 15 mandatory screening process under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). R&R, ECF No. 11. The Court 16 finds the R&R to be correct, well-reasoned, and thorough, and adopts it in every respect. 17 I.…