Legal Opinion

Hammer v. Mark Hagen Plumbing & Heating

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 31, 1989No. C6-88-909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

This case comes before us on an appeal brought by New Mech Companies seeking reversal of a Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals’ decision. The WCCA reversed a compensation judge’s finding which discontinued workers’ compensation benefits being paid to an employee on the grounds that he had reached maximum medical improvement (MMI). We affirm the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals on the MMI issue, but reverse its order that the matter be remanded.

Factual History

James J. Hammer (employee) is 41 years old and suffered his first work-related injury on May 17, 1976, while…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Joyce v. Lewis Bolt & Nut Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Hosking v. METROPOLITAN HOUSE MOVERS CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Hirschbach Motor LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Hopp v. Grist MillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Gibbons v. WeyerhaeuserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API