Legal Opinion

Goetz & Mendelsohn v. National Westminster Bank U.S.A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 30, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff law firm seeks to collect legal fees and disbursements for its representation of the City of East St. Louis, Illinois, and its Mayor, Carl E. Officer, in two separate actions brought by persons involved in certain redevelopment projects which were financed by the sale of municipal bonds. The defendant banks are trustees under certain trust indenture agreements securing payment of said bonds. The trust indenture agreements for the projects in question the "Port Project” and the "Resource Redevelopment Project” both contain clauses (section 11.02) which provide, in pertinent part…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gibson & Cushman Dredging Corp. v. Halliburton Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Broome v. ML Media Opportunity Partners L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Kantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman, P.C. v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API