Legal Opinion

Eternal Cemetery Corporation v. Tammen

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 1, 1959No. 15997PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASSEY, Chief Justice.

This is a suit for permanent injunction. Actually, there were two sets of plaintiffs who were seeking the injunction, the grounds upon which each set predicated its plea for the relief being separate and distinct. The injunction was granted in the trial upon a judgment, the form of which upheld the grounds of both sets of plaintiffs. In other words, the trial court held that one set of plaintiffs was entitled to injunction on the ground that the use to which the defendants sought and threatened to put the surface of their land would destroy the mineral estate under the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sheffield v. HoggTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Sheffield v. HoggTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Harris v. CurrieTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. WoodTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  5. Jones v. Highland Memorial ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Storm Associates, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Aery v. Hoskins, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Robert L. Preston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Bradshaw v. Steadfast Financial, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2013
  5. Farm Credit Bank of Texas v. ColleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API