Legal Opinion

Copley v. Hay

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided January 5, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from special term. Action by George W. Copley and Ellen Dolen against Amelia C. Hay and others. The defendant Hay appeals from an order overruling her demurrer to the plaintiffs’ complaint, and directing judgment thereon, with costs, and from an order denying her motion to resettle the judgment entered.

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, C. J.

This is an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien filed on December 8,1888, against the defendant Amelia C. Hay, as owner, Mull & Fromer, contractors, and Bowers & Vreeland, subcontractors, by the plaintiffs, who furnished materials to Bowers & Vreeland for the carpenter work upon the premises in question. The complaint alleges .the facts necessary in an action to. foreclose a mechanic’s lien, under the act of 1885, c. 342, and alleges, in addition, that on January 11, 1889, the defendant Mull filed his bond for twice the amount of the plaintiffs’ claim or lien herein in the clerk’s office of…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brandt v. RadleyNew York Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Highton v. DessauNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
  3. Scherrer v. Music Hall Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
  4. In re DeanNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Kruger v. BraenderNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API