Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sherman, Clay & Co. v. Turner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1931No. 23055. Department TwoPublished

1DissentHolcomb, J.

(dissenting) — While I agree with the majority that the guaranty in writing in suit is an express and unconditional guaranty, I am nevertheless convinced that this is a case peculiarly requiring the application of the principle of legal laches, which is somewhat different but. analogous to equitable laches. Legal laches has been applied in cases of absolute guaranty in many cases less provocative than this, by the supreme courts of the United States and of New York, Massachusetts, Michigan, Iowa, Nebraska, and others of highest repute.

Each case depends somewhat, of course, upon the peculiar…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Bedford v. KelleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Barhydt v. . EllisNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Second National Bank v. GaylordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  5. Sabin & Moon v. HarrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API