Legal Opinion

Second National Bank v. Gaylord

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 13, 1872PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Bucha/uan Circuit Court. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

On the 12th day of January, 1867, Thomas T. Webster made his promissory note for $500, payable to the order of defendant, E. S. Gaylord, who at the same time wrote upon the back of the note a guarantee as follows: “ For value received, I hereby guarantee the payment of the within.

“E. S. Gaylord.”

Prior to the maturity -of the note, in due course of business, the plaintiff became possessed thereof.

The note not being paid, the plaintiff brought his action thereon, in the Buchanan circuit court, against the defendant, on his guarantee. The defendant relied upon the want of notice of non-payment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Douglass v. HowlandNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  2. Donley v. CampSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  3. Craft v. IshamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1838
  4. Louisville Manufacturing Co. v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  5. Farmers & Mechanics Bank v. KerchevalMichigan Supreme Court · 1853

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ward v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Iowa Valley State Bank v. SigstadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  3. German Savings Bank v. Drake Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. Hoyt v. QuintSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. Davis Sewing Machine Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API