Legal Opinion

Lobdell-Emery Mfg. Co. v. Wilenchik

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 18, 1941No. 7823Published

1Opinion of the Court

MARIS, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff brought an action in the nature of trover to recover the value of metal alleged to have been converted by the defendant. The jury made special findings that the defendant had converted 15.270 pounds of nickel anodes and 606 pounds of monel hooks and that this metal belonged to the plaintiff and found a verdict for the plaintiff. The court refused motions for judgment for the defendant n. o. v. and for a new trial and entered judgment on the verdict.

The defendant contends that the finding that the nickel anodes belonged to the plaintiff was made by the jury…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hartig v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Lessig v. Reading Transit & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Grimes v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Lamp v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Horen v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API