Legal Opinion

Pine Bros. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 18, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

. 'Appeal from 'Ringgold District Court. — Hon. H. M. Towner, Judge. Action to recover damages for injury to property in course of transportation over defendant’s road. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

The appellees purchased a valuable stallion at Bushnell, 111,, and delivered it to the appellant at that place to be shipped to their home at Diagonal, Iowa. The horse,' which was accompanied by one of its owners, was taken sick during the trip and died soon after reaching its destination.

The theory of plaintiff’s ease, as alleged in their petition and presented upon this appeal, is that the transportation was unreasonably and unnecessarily delayed, and that, by reason of such delay and resulting exposure to inclement weather, the horse contracted the disease of which it died. Appellant…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Janesville Live Stock & Shipping Ass'n v. HinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Payne v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co. v. L. J. Upton & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  4. Bob C. Cooper and Jim B. Cooper v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  5. Siegel v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API