Legal Opinion

Freas v. Scott

Cape May County Circuit Court, N.J.

Decided September 20, 1944PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Burling, C. C. J.

Motion has been made to strike out the complaint, pursuant to R. S. 2:27-125; N. J. S. A. 2:27-125, and Supreme Court rules 40 and 80 to 85, inclusive; N. J. S. A. tit. 2, by the defendant.

The attack is two-fold, namely — one, that the complaint is frivolous or insufficient in law, and two, it is sham.

Upon submission of said motion, affidavits in support of the motion^were presented by the defendant, but no affidavit in contravention thereof was presented by the plaintiff.

Upon the adjourned return day of the hearing upon said motion, oral argument was made by the defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Louis Kamm, Inc. v. FlinkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  2. Roselle Park Building & Loan Ass'n v. FriedlanderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clark v. IngleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API