Resnick v. Rowe
District Court, D. Hawaii
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE
MOLLWAY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION.
This is a diversity case arising out of the failed sale of a golf course and other prop erty. Plaintiff David Resnick of Oregon alleges that Defendants Mike Rowe, Bruce Friedman, and Lenders Depot of Sherman Oaks, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”), breached an agreement to purchase that property (Count I), intentionally misrepresented and concealed facts (Count II), made negligent misrepresentations (Count III), and breached the covenant…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Seiferth v. Helicopteros Atuneros, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Seahavn, Ltd. v. Glitnir BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Doe v. GellerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Barranco v. 3D Systems Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2014
- SeaHAVN, Ltd. v. BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.