Legal Opinion

Dunn v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 20, 1920No. 5869PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of murder and given twenty-five years in the penitentiary.

A bill of exceptions discloses that after the jury had been empaneled and the trial had proceeded for some time, one of the jurors was excused with the consent of the defendant, and the case thereafter went to its final conclusion with only eleven jurors. As thus constituted, a verdict was rendered, and all the proceedings had up to the rendition of the verdict, including the verdict itself, before the eleven jurors. This constitutes fatal error and necessitates a reversal. The question…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCampbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Ex Parte ReynoldsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Trinidad v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API