McCampbell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
A statement of the evidence is unnecessary in view of the fact that the appeal is disposed of upon the question of the separation of the jury, the facts pertaining to which are fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree, and received a life term in the penitentiary, and prosecutes this appeal. He excepted to the action of the court in overruling his motion for a continuance, but on an examination of the record, we find no error in this ruling of the court. Th‘e only serious question in this case is with reference to the separation of the jury. In the motion for a new trial, appellant alleges that after the jury were sworn and empaneled, and after the evidence, argument of counsel, and charge of the court had been submitted to them, and…
2Cited by23 opinions
- McDougal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Early v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Gant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.