Legal Opinion

Conser v. Biddy

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 7, 1981No. 81-67PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Associate Justice.

The issue of this appeal is the constitutionality of yet another gender-based statute— Ark. Stat. Ann. § 50-415 (Repl. 1971), which reads:

Conveyance of homestead. — No conveyance, mortgage or other instrument affecting the homestead of any married man shall be of any validity except for taxes, laborers’ and mechanics’ liens, and the purchase money, unless his wife joins in the execution of such instrument and acknowledges the same.

The chancellor held the statute unconstitutional because the same privileges and protections given wives under the statute were not…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Orr v. OrrSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Trimble v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Stanton v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Califano v. GoldfarbSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jegley v. PicadoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Fitton v. Bank of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  3. First Federal Savings of Arkansas v. Beard (In re Beard)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1989
  4. Jegley v. PicadoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API