Winston-Salem Joint Venture v. City of Winston-Salem
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff assigns error to the trial court’s granting of summary judgment, contending that there exist genuine issues as to material facts concerning liability for the late listing penalty.
In effect, the question presented by this assignment is whether G.S. 105-311 controls when the tax supervisor’s office is not in possession of and denies receipt of a listing submitted by mail. The second paragraph of G.S. 105-311(b) provides in pertinent part:
For the purpose of this Subchapter, abstracts submitted by mail shall be deemed to be filed as of the date shown on the postmark…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Watson Industries, Inc. v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Henderson v. . Gill, Comr. of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Standard Trust Co. of New York v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Bachus v. SwansonNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ReavesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- In re Notice of Attachment & Garnishment Issued by Catawba County Tax Collector Against Nuzum-Cross Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Beason v. North Carolina Department of the Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Daily Express, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Crime Control & Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Beason v. North Carolina Department of the Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013