Cosar v. Bemo
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentWelch, Justice
It seems to me there are five questions which are important in this case, and more important as precedent for future trial, as follows:
1. In an automobile negligence action involving a two car collision at a highway intersection where one of the prime issues *228was which car was negligently driven to cause the accident, is it error for the plaintiff’s attorney to argue and state to the jury as a positive fact that another action involving the same accident brought by another party against the same defendant had already been tried, and there determined that the' defendant in the present action…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bratt v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Bagully v. Morning Journal Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Bagully v. Morning Journal Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.