Legal Opinion
United States v. Pani
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 19, 1989No. 88 Civ. 4970 (LLS)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
STANTON, District Judge.
The plaintiff moves to amend the complaint and for partial summary judgment. The defendants move to dismiss plaintiffs claim for unjust enrichment. The plaintiffs motions are granted, and the defendants’ motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
Defendant Dr. Kailash Chandra Pani is a neurosurgeon. He is the sole shareholder of defendant Kailash Chandra Pani, M.D., P.C. (the “corporation”).
In November 1983 Pani was charged in an indictment with mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341-42 (Counts 1-9), making 63 false claims against the government in violation of the criminal…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kailash C. Pani, M.D., and Kailash C. Pani, M.D., P.C. v. Empire Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Tyger Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- United States v. Ulysses Sympson Reed, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.