Legal Opinion
Crosby-Mississippi Resources, Ltd. v. Saga Petroleum U.S., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 2, 1985No. 84-4434PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs-appellants Crosby-Mississippi Resources, Ltd., Stewart Gammill, and L.O. Crosby, working interest owners in certain gas wells, brought this consolidated diversity action against defendants-appellees Saga Petroleum U.S., Inc. (Saga), the operator of those wells, Scurlock Oil Company, and Saga Products Company (Saga Products), alleging inter alia breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the appellees, and we affirm.
FACTS
The appellants are non-operating working interest owners…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sample v. RomineMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Energy AdministrationTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1977
- Piney Woods Country Life School v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Danciger Oil & Refineries, Inc. v. Hamill Drilling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
- Celestine Barby and Helen Barby v. Cabot CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Crosby-Mississippi Resources, Ltd. v. Saga Petroleum U.S., Inc., Scurlock Oil Company, and Saga Products Company, a Partnership, by and Through Saga Petroleum U.S., Inc., a Partner, Defendants- Stewart Gammill, III v. Saga Petroleum U.S., Inc., Scurlock Oil Company, and Saga Products Company, a Partnership, by and Through Saga Petroleum U.S., Inc., a Partner, Defendants- L.O. Crosby, III v. Saga Petroleum U.S., Inc., Scurlock Oil Company, and Saga Products Company, a Partnership, by and Through Saga Petroleum U.S., Inc., a Partner, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- State v. Davis Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. Davis Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986