Legal Opinion
William Payton v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Rick Freeman, Anthony Murray and William Blair
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 1, 1999No. 98-2931PublishedCited by 175 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
William Payton appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims upon the defendants’ 12(b)(6) motion, and its concurrent dismissal of his state law claims because it opted not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over them. For the reasons set out below, we vacate the district court’s decision, and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Facts
Payton’s § 1983 claims arise from a March 14, 1995 encounter with the individual defendants at Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Medical Center (“Rush”) in Chicago, Illinois. Payton alleges that on that…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by175 opinions
- Fabrikant v. FrenchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Donald McCormick v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Lewis Borsellino and I.M. Acquisitions, LLC v. Goldman Sachs Group, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Durante v. Fairlane Town CenterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Timothy T. Ryan, Jr. And Garrett Wainwright v. Mary Immaculate Queen CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
170 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.