Legal Opinion
Pine Island Farmers Coop v. Erstad & Riemer, P.A.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 11, 2001No. C1-01-670PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge. *
Appellants, insurer and insured, contend that the district court erred in holding that the insurer does not have an attorney-client relationship with respondents. Appellants also argue that the district court properly granted the insurer standing to sue respondents for legal malpractice under the doctrine of equitable subrogation. Because the district court properly held that the insurer did not have an attorney-client relationship with respondents, we affirm this holding, but we reverse the holding that the insurer can sue respondents under equitable…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pine Island Farmers Coop v. Erstad & Riemer, P.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Griffeth v. Sawyer Clothing, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1979
- Pine Island Farmers Coop v. Erstad & Riemer, P.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002