Legal Opinion

Raymond v. Raymond

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 7, 2000No. CA 99-1232PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAM Bird, Judge.

The issue in this divorce case is whether Diane Raymond effectively entered her appearance by signing a “Conditional Reconciliation Agreement.” We hold that the chancellor’s decision was not clearly erroneous, and we affirm.

The Raymonds were married in 1988. During the course of the marriage, Diane became an alcoholic and drug abuser. On December 30, 1996, Daniel Raymond filed for divorce. A decree of divorce was entered on May 12, 1997. No appeal was taken. On March 5, 1999, Diane filed a petition to set aside the divorce decree on the grounds that she was not served with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tucker v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Spratley v. Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  4. Thompson v. Potlatch Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Robinson v. BossingerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Raymond v. RaymondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Raymond v. RaymondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API