Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Axtell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1884No. 11,285PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Greene Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Best, C.

The appellee filed a claim against the áppellant for the use of an office for the county superintendent.

*385The second paragraph of the appellant’s answer averred, in substance, that the appellee was the county superintendent and in the discharge of his duties he used his own office; that this was done without any contract whatever with the appellant, and that the claim filed was for the use of such office under such circumstances. A demurrer to this paragraph was sustained, and this ruling is assigned as error.

This paragraph constituted, as it seems to us, a complete •defence to the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Johnson v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. Board of Commissioners v. BlineIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. State ex rel. Eagy v. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Kerlin v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. State ex rel. Kendall v. GreeneIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API