Legal Opinion

Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided November 12, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.

The essential elements of an action for fraud and deceit are representation, falsity, scienter, deception and injury. When these elements are sufficiently pleaded the complaint will withstand a dismissal.

By order of the Supreme Court, New York county, in a separation action, Benjamin Rosenfeld, husband of the plaintiff, was directed to pay to her alimony, pendente lite, at the rate of twenty dollars per week. On June 23, 1932, he was in default of five weeks’ payment. On that day the defendant in the instant action made the following representations to the plaintiff through her attorneys:…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Adams v. . GilligNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Allen v. AddingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  4. In re ThrallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Goldberg v. BerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Russo v. Sofia Bros., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API