Legal Opinion

In re Thrall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1896PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal by Mary E. Thrall from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 29th. day of September, 1896, as denies her application to compel the assignee, for the benefit of creditors of her husband, Edwin A. Thrall, to pay to her the sum of $950, alimony pendente litey claimed to be due her under an order of the Supreme Court bearing; date the 31st day of July, 1894.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

It appears that .on the 12th day of June, 1891, the appellant brought an action against her husband, Edwin A. Thrall, in the Supreme Court, the venue being laid in the county of Kings, to obtain a separation from, her husband upon the ground of cruel and ' inhuman,! treatment. The defendant in said action duly appeared, and such proceedings were had that, on the 31st of July, 1894, an order was made in said action allowing the appellant herein the sum of fifty dollars a week- for her support and maintenance for and during each week from the 12th of May, 1894, until the. final termination of…

2Cited by26 opinions

  1. Polizotti v. PolizottiNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Hayes v. HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. Maddox v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  4. Hayes v. . HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Treherne-Thomas v. Treherne-ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API