Legal Opinion · Dissent

Clarke v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 2007No. 49S05-0612-CR-496Published

1DissentRucker, Justice

Like the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the purpose of Article 1, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution is not to eliminate all contact between the police and the citizenry but rather “to prevent arbitrary and oppressive interference by enforcement officials with the privacy and personal security of individuals.” United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544, 553-54, 100 S.Ct. 1870, 64 L.Ed.2d 497 (1980) (quoting United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543, 554, 96 S.Ct. 3074, 49 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1976)). Thus a consensual encounter between a law enforcement officer and an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. United States v. DraytonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API