Marsh v. Pilcher Hardware Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Ida District Court. — M. E. Hutchison, Judge. Appellee has judgment on verdict for commissions alleged by him to be due him from the defendants. The defendants urge several complaints against the action of the trial court. One of them is that the claim for which a recovery was allowed below had been fully settled. —
1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.
— I. It is conceded that appellee was in the employ of appellant on a stated monthly salary. He claims that, notwithstanding this, there is due him a commission for selling Delco lighting systems and Parrott tractors. As already stated, one defense interposed was accord and satisfaction. The defendants unsuccessfully moved a directed verdict in their behalf *593on this issue. If this motion should have been sustained, no other matter urged on this appeal need be considered; and we address ourselves to that question first.
After the employment of plaintiff by the defendants had been terminated, he…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. BerdoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Tank v. RohwederSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Shull v. McCrumSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Gross v. WallenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bombei v. SchaferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- Fokkena v. First National Bank of Glidden (In Re McLaughlin Farms, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1990
- Mabry v. KnabbSupreme Court of Florida · 1942