Legal Opinion
Hart v. Larson
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 7, 2017No. Case No.: 3:16-cv-01460-BEN-MDDPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1131ORDER:(1) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE (ANTI-SLAPP)(2) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT
ON THE PLEADINGS;(3)GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND
HON. ROGER T. BENITEZ, United States District Judge
Before the Court are the Special Motion to Strike (Anti-SLAPP)1 and the Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Defendants Scott Larson and Scott Larson, P.C. (hereinafter, “Larson”), and the Motion to Amend Complaint filed by Plaintiff Hoyt Hart. (Docket Nos. 6, 7, 24.) The motions are fully briefed. The Court finds the motions suitable for determination on…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gopher Media LLC v. Modern Doc MediaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- MN Investment Inc. et.al. v. NguyenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023