Wills v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partO’Brien, Justice
I write separately to supplement certain inadequacies evident in the lead opinion. *311Initially it should be noted that in State v. McClintock, 732 S.W.2d 268 (Tenn.1987), advice about the future consequence of a guilty plea was not at issue. The thrust of the opinion was that a facially valid judgment of conviction on a prior DUI charge, which had not been attacked by post-trial motions or on direct appeal, could not be collaterally attacked in a subsequent prosecution for a second DUI offense, but only by recourse to the Post-Conviction Procedure Act. The opinion pointed out that if the errors…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. TateoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Burford v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.