Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Wills v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1993Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partO’Brien, Justice

I write separately to supplement certain inadequacies evident in the lead opinion. *311Initially it should be noted that in State v. McClintock, 732 S.W.2d 268 (Tenn.1987), advice about the future consequence of a guilty plea was not at issue. The thrust of the opinion was that a facially valid judgment of conviction on a prior DUI charge, which had not been attacked by post-trial motions or on direct appeal, could not be collaterally attacked in a subsequent prosecution for a second DUI offense, but only by recourse to the Post-Conviction Procedure Act. The opinion pointed out that if the errors…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. United States v. TateoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Burford v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API