Legal Opinion

HARASZTHY v. SHANDEL.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

27 P. 876

1 Colo.App. 137

HARASZTHY et al.

v.

SHANDEL.

Court of Appeals of Colorado

October 12, 1891

Appeal from district court, Arapahoe county; W.S. DECKER, Judge.

Replevin by Arpad Haraszthy & Co. against Oppenheimer, and Mrs. Bertha Shandel, intervener, for a lot of liquors. Judgment for Mrs. Shandel, the intervener. Plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.

Joseph N. Baxter, for appellants.

H.E. Luthe, for appellee.

BISSELL, J.

This controversy grew out of the transactions between one Oppenheimer and Mrs. Shandel, the appellee. Early in 1889, Oppenheimer bought a very considerable quantity of wine and similar…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knox v. McFarranSupreme Court of Colorado · 1879
  2. Merchants' Bank v. McClellandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  3. McMurtrie v. RiddellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  4. Kinney v. WoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  5. LINDSAY v. LINDSAY.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. West Chicago Street Railroad v. LoeweAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  2. HOCKADAY v. GOODWIN.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API