Hackel v. Ford
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
The parties seem to be in the attitude of agreeing that the controlling questions in the case as it was tried in the court below, and as it appears in the record sent to this court, were: First, as to whether the deed of June 1, 1911, referred to in the statement above, was delivered by the Rutherfords to Mrs. Hackel; and, second, as to whether said deed was accepted by Mrs. Hackel.
It is held that proof that a deed was recorded at the instance of the grantors is sufficient, prima facie, to show that such deed was delivered to the grantee at the time it was recorded. Breckenridge v. Coffield…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Taylor v. Sanford, AdministratorTexas Supreme Court · 1917
- Dikes v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Sprinkles v. KerbowTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Breckenridge v. CoffieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ford v. HackelTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Ford v. HackelTexas Commission of Appeals · 1935