Legal Opinion

Hackel v. Ford

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 25, 1932No. 4143PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The parties seem to be in the attitude of agreeing that the controlling questions in the case as it was tried in the court below, and as it appears in the record sent to this court, were: First, as to whether the deed of June 1, 1911, referred to in the statement above, was delivered by the Rutherfords to Mrs. Hackel; and, second, as to whether said deed was accepted by Mrs. Hackel.

It is held that proof that a deed was recorded at the instance of the grantors is sufficient, prima facie, to show that such deed was delivered to the grantee at the time it was recorded. Breckenridge v. Coffield…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Sanford, AdministratorTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Dikes v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Sprinkles v. KerbowTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  5. Breckenridge v. CoffieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ford v. HackelTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Ford v. HackelTexas Commission of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API