Legal Opinion
Hawk Enterprises, Inc. v. Cash America International, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 19, 2012No. 109,226PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN F. FISCHER, Chief Judge.
11 Plaintiff Hawk Enterprises, Inc., appeals an order of the district court granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to Hawk's tortious interference theory of recovery.1 The appeal has been assigned to the accelerated docket pursuant to Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.86(b), 12 0.8. Supp. 2008, ch. 15, app. 1, and the matter stands submitted without appellate briefing. Because we cannot conclude as a matter of law that Defendants cannot be held liable for tortious interference, we reverse and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings.
B…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Holloway v. SkinnerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Hinson v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- American Medical International, Inc. v. GiurintanoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Robinson v. HossackColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Cuyler v. BOKF, NADistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2020
- PENN GRAND MANAGEMENT v. HOMERIVER GROUPCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2020
- Pizza Inn Inc v. OdetallahDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2022
- Poinsett v. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.