Legal Opinion
Matilda Bonny v. Anthony J. Principi
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided August 17, 2004No. 00-39(E)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IVERS, Judge:
The matter before the Court is the appellant’s application for an award of reasonable attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the appellant’s application.
I. FACTS
The appellant is the surviving spouse of a veteran, who served in the U.S. Army from January 1941 to September 1945. On August 10, 1995, the veteran was notified that an administrative review of his claims file had resulted in a determination that a February 1948 regional office (RO) decision contained clear and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Frankel v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Stillwell v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Karen Gordon v. James B. PeakeUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2008
- Clara Sue Padgett v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009
- Clara Sue Padgett v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009
- Karen Gordon v. James B. PeakeUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2008
- Robert E. Lohnes III v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007