Legal Opinion
United States v. Julian Peter Gabriel
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 6, 1983No. 82-1587PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Julian Gabriel was convicted after a jury trial of bank robbery and assault in the commission of a bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d) (1976). On appeal, Gabriel alleges as error: (1) the denial of his motion for a bill of particulars; (2) the denial of his motion to suppress evidence; (3) the trial court’s refusal to admit allegedly exculpatory evidence; (4) the trial court’s instruction on recently stolen property; and (5) prosecutorial misconduct. We affirm.
On October 22,1981, an armed man wearing a ski mask entered a bank in Colorado Springs and ordered the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Frederick Dale AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Gary E. Hansen, Daniel E. Means, AKA Daniel E. Johnson, and Stephen R. BryantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Carl O. LudwigCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. Najib Mansour Atisha (85-1537), Michael Covintgon (85-1775), DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. NguyenDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- United States v. Clarence Edwin Rinke, and Duane Keith NevinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- State v. FergusonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- United States v. Nick KapnisonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.