Fustolo v. Hollander
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtBotsford, J.
The defendant, Fredda Hollander, appeals from the denial of her special motion to dismiss under G. L. c. 231, § 59H (§ 59H), the “anti-SLAPP” statute, 1 claiming that the conduct for which she was sued — writing five newspaper articles that contained allegedly defamatory statements about the plaintiff, Steven Fustolo, and his properties located in the North End section of Boston — constitutes petitioning activity protected by the statute. We agree with the motion judge that the defendant did not exercise her “right of petition” within the meaning of § 59H, and affirm the denial of the special…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Duracraft Corp. v. Holmes Products Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Fabre v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Fabre v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Jones v. TaibbiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hospital, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
- 477 Harrison Ave., LLC v. JACE Boston, LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
- Marabello v. Boston Bark Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Town of Hanover v. New England Regional Council of CarpentersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Gaudette v. Mainely Media, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.