Legal Opinion

Fustolo v. Hollander

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 1, 2010No. SJC-10485PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotsford, J.

The defendant, Fredda Hollander, appeals from the denial of her special motion to dismiss under G. L. c. 231, § 59H (§ 59H), the “anti-SLAPP” statute, 1 claiming that the conduct for which she was sued — writing five newspaper articles that contained allegedly defamatory statements about the plaintiff, Steven Fustolo, and his properties located in the North End section of Boston — constitutes petitioning activity protected by the statute. We agree with the motion judge that the defendant did not exercise her “right of petition” within the meaning of § 59H, and affirm the denial of the special…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Duracraft Corp. v. Holmes Products Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Fabre v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  4. Fabre v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Jones v. TaibbiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hospital, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  2. 477 Harrison Ave., LLC v. JACE Boston, LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  3. Marabello v. Boston Bark Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  4. Town of Hanover v. New England Regional Council of CarpentersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  5. Gaudette v. Mainely Media, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API