Legal Opinion

Conine v. Olympia Logging Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1906No. 5959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurston county, Limn, J., entered June 14, 1905, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff for personal injuries sustained hy a logger by reason of the starting of an engine and the tautening of a cable.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

— This cause was once before appealed to this court’, and was reported in 36 Wash. 345, 18 Pao. 932. The former appeal was determined upon demurrer to the com*51plaint, and for a statement of the averments of the complaint we refer to the former opinion. The trial court had sustained the demurrer on the ground that no negligence was charged to the defendant, and that the negligence shown was that of a fellow servant. This court was, however, of the opinion that, as against demurrer, the complaint, because of the particular situation, did charge actionable negligence against defendant, in that it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Port Townsend v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Elmendorf v. GoldenWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Brabon v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Conine v. Olympia Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Costa v. Pacific Coast Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cleary v. General Contracting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Gardner v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Hage v. LuedinghausWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Wesley v. Holly Hill Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  5. Keller v. White River Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API