Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1913No. Criminal No. 320PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Navajo. Sidney Sapp, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The respondent was indicted for the crime of murder. He was tried by a jury and acquitted. While testifying in his own behalf, on his cross-examination, the district attorney ashed the defendant -this question, “Have you ever been convicted of a felony?” An objection to the question was sustained by the trial court, and the defendant was not required to answer. The state has appealed from this ruling of the court.

Paragraph 1038 of the Penal Code of 1901, provides that “in all criminal actions the territory may appeal to the *441supreme court ou questions of law alone: . . . Provided, that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. WebbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. United States v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Cannon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. People v. HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. People v. TerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. GrayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. State Ex Rel. McDougall v. TvedtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  4. State v. KeepAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. KelseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API