State v. Keep
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NESBETT, Chief Justice.
In our opinion No. 269 in this case we held that the state had no right to petition the superior court for review of a judgment of acquittal rendered by a district magistrate court.
The state had argued that the magistrate had committed at least three errors of law in his rulings during the trial and had then granted a judgment of acquittal to the defendant. It was pointed out that numerous cases were pending involving similar charges and that the proper outcome of all of the cases would depend upon a correct and uniform application of the law. For this reason, the state…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. WebbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- United States v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- State v. RobbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. BrowderAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. Marathon Oil CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Kott v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. GibsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. MichelCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.