Legal Opinion
People v. Hargrove
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 13, 1995PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.), rendered December 14, 1992, convicting him of murder in the second degree and assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We disagree with the defendant’s claim that he was denied effective cross-examination of the one eyewitness to the crimes. Although a criminal defendant is guaranteed the right to confront all adverse witnesses through cross-examination (Delaware v Van Arsdall, 475 US 673; Davis v Alaska, 415 US 308), that right is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- People v. PavaoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. StanardNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. BrehenyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. RufranoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. HargroveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- People v. MaconAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998